Articles

The journal al-Manār, published from Cairo between 1898 and 1940, was the mouthpiece of Islamic modernism, that intellectual trend which articulated modernity from within the Islamic discursive tradition. Islam was thus used to distinguish between and at the same time connect both twins of the modern order, religion and society. The Prophet Muḥammad not only brought allegedly godly, timeless teachings most appropriate for modernity, but also himself took care of both religion and society. This chapter shows how the editor of al-Manār, Rashīd Riḍā, constructed the figure of the Prophet to represent an ideal religious and social reformer. This representation pursued two aims: the emotionally charged figure of the Prophet mediated the salience and practicability of abstract Islamic principles to a wider audience; and he served as a role model and lent authority to Riḍā, the self-styled reformist, himself. The reconstruction of prophets as social reformers was not peculiar to Islam, as the author illustrates by pointing to parallel endeavours by modern Jewish and Christian theologians and intellectuals. These parallels attest to the primacy of modernity in Riḍā’s appropriation of the Islamic tradition, and specifically in his construction of the Prophet Muḥammad.

Zemmin, Florian. "The Modern Prophet: Rashīd Riḍā's Construction of Muḥammad as Religious and Social Reformer." In The Presence of the Prophet in Early Modern and Contemporary Islam, edited by Rachida Chih, Stefan Reichmuth, und David Jordan, 349-69 (Leiden: Brill, 2021).

How to be authentically modern? This was the pervasive question behind the ideological elaborations of numerous religious and nationalist movements toward the end of the nineteenth century. Many of them attempted to find the answer in an imaginary past. This article claims that Islamist movements are not an exception, but rather an affirmation to this rule. The orientation towards a “golden age” of Islam and its allegedly authentic Islamic way of life has been a crucial feature of Islamist thought across all national, sectarian and ideological divides. The article traces this invocation of the past historically back to the construction of specifically Islamic forms of modernity by representatives of Islamic modernism in the second half of the nineteenth century. Interpreting their modernist thought in the context of more global nineteenth-century concepts and narratives, the article argues from a comparative perspective that Islamic modernism laid the foundations for the ways in which Islamist thinkers have constructed both individual and collective forms of Muslim identities.


Jung, Dietrich. “Islamism, Islamic Modernism and the Search for Modern Authenticity in an Imaginary Past.” Religions 12, no. 11 (2021): 1–13.

Monism was not just a philosophical outlook, but also an early twentieth-century new religious movement. Founded by the internationally renowned evolutionary theorist Ernst Haeckel, it was supposed to be a “Religion of Science” that repudiated matter-mind dualism in favor of reverence for a divinized Mother Nature. This article traces the genesis of the German Monist League and how it was transplanted to the United States by the publisher, Paul Carus. Although readers of this journal are likely to know about new religions that embrace “pseudoscience,” the surprise is that Monism had followers with significant scientific renown including multiple Nobel Prize-winning scientists, famous philosophers of science, and even a celebrated sociologist. Scholars of secularism or science and religion will want to know about how Haeckel and his followers constructed a hybrid Scientific Faith or Secular Church that this article demonstrates went on to provide the foundation for professionalizing American philosophy.

Storm, Jason Ānanda Josephson. “Monism and the Religion of Science.” Nova Religio 25, no. 2 (2021): 12–39.

Conceptual history holds tremendous potential to address a central issue in Near Eastern Studies, namely the formation of modernity in the Near East, provisionally located between the mid-nineteenth and mid-twentieth cen-turies. The encounter with European powers, primarily Britain and France, was a decisive historical factor in this formation; and European hegemony is, in fact, inscribed into the very concept of “modernity,”  which we take as an historical, rather than analytical, concept. Th e conceptual formation of modernity in Arabic and Turkish was, however, a multilayered process; involving both ruptures and continuities, intersecting various temporalities, and incorporating concepts from several languages. To interrogate this multilayered process, we suggest the metaphor of the Sattelzeit (Saddle Period) as a heuristic tool, precisely because of its being tied to modernity. Finally, the article will show what conceptual history of the Near East has to off er to conceptual history more broadly.

Zemmin, Florian and Henning Sievert. “Conceptual History of the Near East. The Sattelzeit as a Heuristic Tool for Interrogating the Formation of a Multilayered Modernity.” Contributions to the History of Concepts 16, no. 2 (2021): 1-26.

This essay is a response to the inquiries and discussions of ‘anthropology’s secular conditioning’ that Khaled Furani, Joel Robbins, Jonathan Boyarin, Matthew Engelke, Richard Handler, Elayne Oliphant, and Eduardo Dullo initiate in this thematic issue of Religion. I focus on the moves that constitute anthropology and secularity. Whereas I endorse the grounded approaches that Boyarin, Engelke, Handler, Oliphant, and Dullo represent, and their highlighting of ambiguities and complexities in practices of anthropology and secularity, I am critical of Furani and Robbins’ attempt at ‘moving outside the secular condition’ by turning anthropology into an attitude in which openness to the divine appears vital. Historically, the religion/secular binary is intrinsic not only to a Christian conditioning of Western scholarship but also to political and popular practices that have materialized across the world. To me, therefore, doing religion does not seem like a credible way of undoing anthropology’s secular conditioning.

Tafjord, Bjørn Ola. “On the (Un)Doing of Anthropology and Secularity,and Its Relevance for Religious Studies.” Religion 51, no. 4 (2021): 614–22.

This article proposes the field perspective as an approach to explain organizational activities in sustainability transitions. It applies this framework to analyze environmental activities of religious organizations in Germany and Switzerland. Religious organizations can become important actors in transitions by drawing on their extensive membership, material resources, and public visibility. However, to date, research is dearth about the conditions that facilitate transition activities of religious organizations. The empirical insights of this study show differences in the activities (a) between religious incumbents and challengers and (b) between the supra-local and local scale. The field perspective allows for explaining these differences as outcomes of the organizations’ power positions and diverging institutional logics on the supra-local and local scale. Rather than religious beliefs, the interplay of power and scale-specific logics shapes activities of religious organizations.

Koehrsen, Jens, and Fabian Huber. “A Field Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: The Case of Religious Organizations.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 40, no. 3 (2021): 408–20.

Lasting problems of disorder on the island of Madagascar, and the incapacity of state actors to control or to prevent insecurity effectively, are driving villagers in rural areas to search urgently for solutions. The ethnographic case study focuses on the recent establishment of two vigilante groups in the Bongolava region of middle-western Madagascar, the so-called Zazamainty and Lambamena, whose work is based, among others, on a magic worldview and a locally well-known cultural code related to the precolonial past. The inactivity of the state sets the precondition for such magic momentum, as villagers are taking recourse on ideas and practices based on what is presented as ‘traditional authority,’ the only and last refuge they have. Villagers, by consequence, appear to navigate between two parallel, partly concurrently and overlapping registers of authority and legitimacy: State authority, and the connected global normativity of the legal state, of democracy, of peacemaking, or civil society on the one side, and local expressions of authority on the other. Malagasy actors, however, are particularly able and experienced to act within such dynamic world of plural legitimacies and authorities, as an additional regard on the horizon of long-standing cultural patterns allows to conclude.

Kneitz, Peter. “A Magic Momentum: Negotiating Authority in the Bongolava Region, Madagascar.” In Challenging Authorities: Ethnographies of Legitimacy and Power in Eastern and Southern Africa, edited by Arne S. Steinforth, and Sabine Klocke-Daffa, 319–45. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

This chapter focuses on the recent judicial activism in reforming Muslim Personal Law (mpl) in India questioning the relationship between religious freedom, citizenship rights, and secularism. India follows a regime of religion-specific personal law in matters of marriage, divorce, maintenance, adoption, custody of children, succession, and inheritance of property. In recent years, a unique jurisdiction of the Indian appellate judiciary known as the Public Interest Litigation (pil) has been often evoked to question and reform religious practices, including personal laws and especially the mpl. In this chapter, two landmark pil cases — the Vishwa Lochan Madan case and the Muslim Women’s Quest for Equality (popularly known as the Triple Talaq case) — that subjected mpl to judicial scrutiny, are analyzed. The trajectory of these two discrepant cases foregrounds the multivalent nature of constitutional law and their efficacy in understanding the issue of secularism in India. It shows how the boundaries between the religious and secular, created and contested in the judicial sphere, have important consequences for our understanding of religious freedom of minorities and women’s rights in a multi-cultural, post-colonial nation-state.

Chakrabarti, Anindita. “Religious Freedom, Legal Activism, and Muslim Personal Law in Contemporary India: A Sociological Exploration of Secularism.” In Religious Freedom: Social-Scientific Approaches, edited by Olga Breskaya, Roger Finke, and Giuseppe Giordan, 35–58. Brill, 2021.

In the 1990s, Burkhard Gladigow proposed the concept of a European History of Religion in order to complicate existing accounts of the religious developments in Europe since the Renaissance and to ofer an elaborate model of historical analysis for the study of religion as a cultural studies discipline. Tis approach has been criticized by some scholars as needlessly privileging Europe as the space of a particular historical development that supposedly is more complex and essentially diferent from non-European histories (of religion). In this chapter I want to argue that on the contrary, Gladigow's European History of Religion from the outset aimed at a much more open model and implied a potential extension to a global perspective. In a later text he expands on his 1995 proposal by suggesting that the constellation of a »European History of Religion« has to be understood as the succession to a »Mediterranean« and a »Roman« History of Religion. While Gladigow does not spend much time describing in detail what he means by the latter two, I want to argue that in a continuation of this idea and as a succession to the European History of Religion since at least the 19th century we can speak of a Global History of Religion. Additionally, one of the main takeaways from Gladigow's approach, next to the large number of not yet fully explored analytical ideas regarding specifc characteristics of modern European history which he developed out of his deep knowledge of the Ancient world, is the attention that he paid both to semantic changes as well as to the structural dimensions of the European History of Religion.4 Both aspects can fruitfully be taken up in a global context

Hermann, Adrian. “European History of Religion, Global History of Religion: On the Expansion of a Gladigowian Concept for the Study of Religion.” In Religion in Culture — Culture in Religion: Burkhard Gladigow's Contribution to Shifting Paradigms in the Study of Religion, edited by Christoph Auffarth, Alexandra Grieser, and Anne Koch, 237–68. Universität Tübingen.

Bei der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit die Annahme einer realen Existenz von Gott, Göttern und anderen übernatürlichen Wesen auszuklammern, gehört zu den Grundvoraussetzungen der nichttheologischen Religionswissenschaft. Um nicht in den Streit der Religionen über den Wahrheitsgehalt ihrer Glaubenslehren hineingezogen zu werden, stützt sie sich auf das Prinzip des »methodischen Agnostizismus«, der mit einem positiven Glaubens- oder Unglaubensbekenntnis nicht vereinbar ist. In Abgrenzung zum Wissenschaftsverständnis der Theologie als Lehre von oder Rede über Gott (θεός + λόγος) postuliert der Agnostizismus die grundsätzliche Unerkennbarkeit einer transzendenten Realität. Auf dieser Grundlage wurde es möglich, sich vom Wahrheitsanspruch des Christentums distanzieren zu können, ohne ihn explizit verneinen zu müssen. 

Junginger, Horst. “Etsi deus non daretur: die Säkularität von Religionswissenschaft.” In Religion in Culture — Culture in Religion: Burkhard Gladigow's Contribution to Shifting Paradigms in the Study of Religion, edited by Christoph Auffarth, Alexandra Grieser, and Anne Koch, 119–40. Universität Tübingen, 2021.

Das Werk Burkhard Gladigows findet seinen sichtbarsten, ja materiellen Ausdruck im umfangreichen Corpus seiner Publikationen, von denen wichtige Impulse für die Erschließung neuer Forschungsperspektiven der deutschen Religionswissenschaft ausgegangen sind. Ohne Zweifel ist es die intellektuelle Wirkung eines Gelehrten, die am meisten gelobt wird und den Ruhm begründet. Ich will in diesem Beitrag jedoch auf einen Bereich wissenschaftlicher Tätigkeit eingehen, der seltener mit Lobesreden bedacht wird und leicht in Vergessenheit gerät, weil er sich im Hintergrund vollzieht. Ich meine Gladigows Wirken als Wissenschaftsorganisator, der maßgeblich zur Institutionalisierung und Professionalisierung der Religionswissenschaft in Deutschland beigetragen hat. Dies betrifft einerseits seinen Beitrag zur Profilierung der Religionswissenschaft an der Universität Tübingen, den ich jedoch nur aus der Ferne beobachten konnte und deshalb hier nur am Rande erwähne. Besser vertraut bin ich dagegen mit seinem Wirken in der Deutschen Vereinigung für Religionsgeschichte (DVRG), deren Entwicklung er über mehrere Jahrzehnte entscheidend mitgeprägt hat. Es war auch eine Tagung der DVRG, auf der ich Gladigow 1980 zum ersten Mal begegnet bin, und unsere Beziehung danach wurde vor allem durch Zusammenarbeit auf dem Feld wissenschaftlicher Dienstleistungen für die scientific community der Religionswissenschaft geprägt. Der vorliegende Band, mit dem Gladigows wissenschaftliche Leistung geehrt wird, bietet mir die Gelegenheit, seinen Beitrag zur Entwicklung der DVRG und der institutionellen Transformation der Religionswissenschaft in Deutschland während der letzten Jahrzehnte in den Blick zu nehmen.

Seiwert, Hubert. “Professionalisierung der Religionswissenschaft: Burkhard Gladigow in der Deutschen Vereinigung für Religionsgeschichte.” In Religion in Culture — Culture in Religion: Burkhard Gladigow's Contribution to Shifting Paradigms in the Study of Religion, edited by Christoph Auffarth, Alexandra Grieser, and Anne Koch, 53–68. Universität Tübingen, 2021.

This paper looks at the Kurdish women’s struggles for gender justice at the intersection of two diverse social movements in Turkey: the Kurdish national movement, on the one hand, and the Turkish feminist movement, on the other. It argues that the Kurdish Women’s Movement (KWM) has functioned as a powerful process of learning for both men and women in the Kurdish community and in the larger society. It has destabilized and transformed the feudal–patriarchal relations and norms in the Kurdish community, the lingering sexism in the Kurdish movement, and the majoritarian constraints in the Turkish feminist movement.

Merdjanova, Ina. “The Kurdish Women’s Movement in Turkey and Its Struggle for Gender Justice.” Histories 1, no. 3 (2021): 184–98.

Die digitale Sicherung von Daten zu Objektbeständen ist eine zunehmend als relevant erachtete Aufgabe in Sammlungen und Museen, um Objekte systematisch einordnen und schnell auffinden, aber auch um sie inhaltlich gruppieren zu können. In der Religionskundlichen Sammlung wird seit 2001 eine digitale Datenbank verwendet, die das bis dahin verwendete System von hand-oder maschinenschriftlichen Karteikarten abgelöst hat. Dass sich in den Prozessen der Inventarisierung und Kategorisierung von Objekten Wissensordnungen und Interessenlagen spiegeln und dass mit der Digitalisierung von Daten Informationslücken zur Provenienz von Objekten einerseits deutlich werden, andererseits aber auch neu entstehen können, ist eine Erfahrung, die Ausgangspunkt der Überlegungen für diesen Beitrag ist. Wir werden im Folgenden aufzeigen, warum ein digitales Inventarisierungssystem so aufgebaut sein sollte, dass grundsätzlich die Herkunftsgeschichte von Objekten abgefragt wird und somit für Leerstellen in der Provenienz sensibilisiert. Darüber hinaus möchten wir darauf aufmerksam machen, dass bei der Übertragung von Daten aus einem analogen in ein digitales Inventarisierungsformat die Gefahr besteht, dass Informationen zu Objektgeschichten verloren gehen können, die zur Klärung von Provenienz fehlen. Wir halten es zudem für unerlässlich, dass die Digitalisierung musealer Bestände mit einer Differenzierung und Reflexion der erhobenen Daten sowie der zugrunde gelegten Klassifikationen einhergeht. Seit 2018 bringt Susanne Rodemeier als neue Kuratorin eine weitere inhaltliche Ausrichtung in die Religionskundliche Sammlung der Philipps-Universität Marburg ein: Provenienzforschung zu Objekten aus kolonialen und missionsbezogenen Kontexten. Jüngst aufgefundenes Archivmaterial zeigt, dass zumindest in manchen Fällen einmal mehr Wissen über Geber*innen und Objektgeschichte bestand, und dass es im Zuge der Digitalisierung in den frühen 2000er Jahren offensichtlich nicht als vorrangig angesehen wurde, Daten vollständig zu dokumentieren.

Rodemeier, Susanne, and Edith Franke. “Digitale Inventarisierung: Chancen und Herausforderungen für die Provenienzforschung der Religionskundlichen Sammlung der Philipps-Universität Marburg.” In Digitalisierung ethnologischer Sammlungen: Perspektiven aus Theorie und Praxis, edited by Hans P. Hahn et al., 183–98. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2021.

When he wrote A Secular Age, Charles Taylor discussed the trajectory of societies of the North Atlantic influenced by Western Christianity and the changes in secularity they experienced. He had conceptualized three types of secularities: Secularity I, as separation between religion and state; Secularity II, qua decline of belief and practice over time; and Secularity III, or a condition of belief, “where religious belief is one option among others, and not necessarily the easiest one.” Taylor, however, acknowledged the limitation inherent to his work as contingent on a specific cultural area. In his approach, which combines phenomenology and hermeneutics with intellectual history, he has emphasized one particular path and its variants, but he has shied away from applying to non-Western societies the categories originally devised to analyze the forms of secularity that have unfolded in the West. Yet in our “secular age,” which is also the age of globalization, it has become diffcult to avoid the question of whether the trajectory of secularity within Western Europe and North America represents a secular exceptionalism that cannot be replicated elsewhere and precludes any Gadamerian “fusion of horizons.” This has implications that go beyond religion and the definition of the “secular” as it affects human rights, freedom of conscience, international law, and, in the end, global politics.

Laliberté, André. “How Do We Measure Secularity?” Journal of Law and Religion (2021): 1–8. Published online https://doi:10.1017/jlr.2021.21

This is a review article of the volume edited by Mirjam Künkler, John Madeley, and Shylashri Shankar A Secular Age Beyond the West. Religion, Law and the State in Asia, the Middle East and North Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.